The swinging pendulum of sexism arrives! Ladies, Men can get raped too. Remember that.
Just to put some perspective in this for those people who may be confused at how a guy can get a boner but not really be sexually charged, so to speak…
Ladies, you know how your nipples get hard for seemingly no reason (sans stepping into a cold room anyway)? You go to put on a shirt and your nipples are poking out like they haven’t seen daylight in over 40 years? Or you brush them up against something and BAMMO, nipple town? Or someone slaps you in the tits and they’re standing full mister?
You get where I’m going with this? Your sexual organs are built to respond to stimulus, be it one you personally find sexually gratifying or not. Saying a dude who gets a boner while he’s otherwise not consenting to sex is lying about the fact would be like saying any girl who gets wet while getting raped is actually enjoying it/wants it.
so… you know… dont be stupid about this people. guys can get raped too and girls can most definitely be the fuckin perps.
People who think men don’t get raped are just as bad as the people who think men can’t control their urges to rape women. It happens less often, but it still happens, and it’s just as traumatizing for the male victim. You can’t just disregard a victim based on their gender.
Can we also include that females can rape other females and males can rape other males too?
All of the above.
That one time a post on Tumblr about male rape victims didn’t get shit on at all. The only thing anywhere near bad about this is the insistence that men are raped a lot less often, which is incorrect.
Gift for my nephew’s first birthday, if you can just send me my award for best Uncle ever that’d be great
I’m Spider-Dan, and I approve this gift.
All New X-Men by Alex Ross
*SLAMS FISTS ON TABLE* I WANT TO BE A HOT COSPLAYER
"Who’s the girl in the relationship?"
No one. We’re both boys. That’s literally the whole point.
"Oh no that’s not what I meant I just meant"
No I know what you meant, but let me just tell you that every time you assume there is a man and a woman in a relationship that you’re assuming there is a dominant and submissive person in the relationship. You assume the man is in charge and the woman does as she is told. You assume women are lesser than the man. That’s what you’re asking. You’re asking who is weaker.
Furthermore, when you say who is the man and who is the woman, you’re telling gay people that they shouldn’t be gay. They should still be heteronormative. They should still try to be straight. A true relationship doesn’t have two men. It doesn’t have two women. It has a man and a woman. “Gay people don’t really exist. They never really existed.” That’s what you’re saying.
Every time you ask who is the man and who is the woman, who wears the pants, who is the top or the bottom, you’re saying that you don’t think gay people exist. You’re saying you don’t think women are strong.
You’re literally telling me that you are a bigot.
For the record, I see no problem with a dominant/submissive personality type in a relationship, just as I see no problem with the woman being the dominant. But hey, that’s just me.